Lost 20 Trades in a Row – Bad Luck or Bad Timing?

Over the past five months, I’ve maintained an 80% win rate, but recently everything fell apart. Between mid-November and today, I’ve lost 20 trades in a row, ultimately blowing up my account.

I didn’t change my strategy or approach during this time. It’s left me wondering: is this time of year just particularly bad for trading, or did I just hit an extreme streak of bad luck?

Would love to hear your thoughts or if anyone else has experienced something similar during this period.

Any advice before I get back on the horse?

  1. Your trading plan has to be repeatable for collected data to make sense. So your execution has to be comparable in all of your trades.

  2. I kinda feel there is something you’re doing wrong… I mean let’s be honest here.

From 80% win rate with 1:3 and 1:4 trades… to losing 20 in a row…

It’s ALMOST impossible to lose 20 in a row if you’re consistent with execution.

Actually losing 20 in a row overall, with random buy and sell clicking… is next to impossible.

So statistics say that no matter how you look at it… there was some unlucky-ness involved.

Btw… statistics also say that trading against the trend is more likely to go wrong. I don’t know your system… just saying it’s something to consider.

@Riley
My data shows I have less than 0.1% chance of losing 20 in a row… and I’m FAR from having an 80% win rate.

@Riley
Not true about the ‘losing 20 in a row’ theory. I’ve put together multiple profitable EAs based on manual strategies over the years, and looking at the backtest it’s almost guaranteed to lose 20+ at one point or another (based on non-subjective strategies). Any subjectivity or luck could prevent this though.

@Chandler
If you had the slightest idea about how statistics work, you’d understand how improbable 20 losses in a row is… but sure keep believing whatever you want.

Riley said:
@Chandler
If you had the slightest idea about how statistics work, you’d understand how improbable 20 losses in a row is… but sure keep believing whatever you want.

I will believe from what I see from hard backtested data. You can believe in a subjective theory.

@Chandler
There is nothing ‘hard’ about backtested data.

Riley said:
@Chandler
There is nothing ‘hard’ about backtested data.

I’m not arguing with a speculation airhead. All I’m saying is - losing 20 in a row over a large period of time is not improbable, at all.

@Chandler
It literally is. Of course, it depends on plenty of factors…but losing 20 in a row is insanely improbable.

I take 100 trades per year. I’ve been trading for 8 years… let’s say I’ll be trading for another 10 maybe…

All together around 2000-2500 trades.

So far the biggest losing streak I had was 9 trades. And that was already extremely unlikely to happen.

This is not even nearly a big enough sample for a scenario like that to have big odds.

A singular trade outcome is always 50-50, like flipping a coin. Do you know how improbable flipping heads is 20 times in a row in 2500 flips? It’s less than 1% or 1 in almost 500.

@Riley
To be in the trading game for 8 years and think a singular trade outcome is 50/50 is all I need to know you’re talking some BS. You’ve not got the experience in backtested tick data like I do, and let me tell you, 20 L’s in a row is pretty probable. End of story.

@Chandler
Every singular trade has the base probability of 50/50. It’s measured based on only 2 possible outcomes, like a coin flip.

You are uneducated, ignorant and your backtests don’t mean shit.

End of story :heart:.

@Riley
But it’s NOT a coin flip, is it? It’s got brokerage fees and spreads involved.

I’m misunderstood, profitable and know exactly what I’m talking about in this game.

You are speculative, not profitable, and just an annoying bot like 1% commenter airhead who thinks they know something without real-time experience!

Don’t bother responding to this; I know you will be itching to… being a top 1% commenter and all, this is what you like to do with your time.

@Chandler
This comment is empty, admin should fix.

No, you were royally lucky when you had that 80% win rate. Markets go from ranging to trending markets and vice versa, so your method works in one market regime; in the other, it goes straight to a margin call.

I call it ‘The walk on water feeling’. If you have win after win, you start to feel you can walk on water and can do no wrong. Reality really hurts.
At first, the less you know is strangely reassuring; however, you start to think more about what you are doing and start to get a thirst for more information, and what you consume starts to affect what you were originally doing. That’s my thoughts. Good luck on your journey.

I am gonna sound like a broken record here (since I have said countless times about fundamentals on here), you need to learn fundamentals. For your case, since you are a swing trader, you need to know the fundamental backings of currencies and why does price even move (spoiler: it does not move from f—ing lines on a chart).

I, myself, am still learning (I am not profitable) and there is a lot of shit to learn. You could be 10 years deep and still learn new stuff.

Learning fundamentals is not just trading when there are high impact news and calling it a day; it is about learning monetary policy, fiscal policy, geopolitics, economic indicators, risk on, risk off, etc.

Even if you are not a swing trader, you need to know this stuff for your bias.

Edit: grammar lmao.

I’ve heard that it’s easier to trade continuations than reversals.

Hollis said:
I’ve heard that it’s easier to trade continuations than reversals.

IMO, a quality reversal setup should essentially look like a continuation, but of the new trend. If it doesn’t (i.e., trying to catch the very top or bottom), then that’s an issue.

I feel like as a beginner that account size is too small for swing trading. Maybe try scalping. I’ve never seen a losing streak that long. Over what period of time did you lose those 20 trades?